Review



activity wheels  (Columbus Instruments)


Bioz Verified Symbol Columbus Instruments is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Columbus Instruments manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Columbus Instruments activity wheels
    Activity Wheels, supplied by Columbus Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 54 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/activity wheels/product/Columbus Instruments
    Average 93 stars, based on 54 article reviews
    activity wheels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    97
    Med Associates Inc wheel activity rwa
    (A, B, D-E) No significant differences were observed between RW and ABA mice in the change of mean daily running wheel activity <t>(RWA),</t> overall mean daily RWA, or dark-phase RWA across <t>both</t> <t>habituation</t> and ABA periods. (C) During the light phase, ABA mice exhibited higher RWA than RW controls only during the ABA period (p = 0.0191). (F) During the light phase, RW group did not show a strong correlation between the % body weight loss during the ABA period and Δ Light-phase RWA, whereas a strong positive correlation was seen in the ABA group (Pearson’s r = 0.7251, p = 0.0022). (G) In both the RW and ABA group, no significant correlations between the % body weight loss during the ABA period and Δ dark-phase RWA were observed. Shaded areas represent the dark phase of the light cycle. ABA (Activity-Based Anorexia) and RW (running wheel) groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Analyses were performed using an unpaired t-test as well as a two-way ANOVA or mixed-effects models followed by Šidák’s post hoc comparisons. Pearson correlation analyses were performed for panels F and G. *p < 0.05.
    Wheel Activity Rwa, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/wheel activity rwa/product/Med Associates Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    wheel activity rwa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Columbus Instruments activity wheels
    (A, B, D-E) No significant differences were observed between RW and ABA mice in the change of mean daily running wheel activity <t>(RWA),</t> overall mean daily RWA, or dark-phase RWA across <t>both</t> <t>habituation</t> and ABA periods. (C) During the light phase, ABA mice exhibited higher RWA than RW controls only during the ABA period (p = 0.0191). (F) During the light phase, RW group did not show a strong correlation between the % body weight loss during the ABA period and Δ Light-phase RWA, whereas a strong positive correlation was seen in the ABA group (Pearson’s r = 0.7251, p = 0.0022). (G) In both the RW and ABA group, no significant correlations between the % body weight loss during the ABA period and Δ dark-phase RWA were observed. Shaded areas represent the dark phase of the light cycle. ABA (Activity-Based Anorexia) and RW (running wheel) groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Analyses were performed using an unpaired t-test as well as a two-way ANOVA or mixed-effects models followed by Šidák’s post hoc comparisons. Pearson correlation analyses were performed for panels F and G. *p < 0.05.
    Activity Wheels, supplied by Columbus Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/activity wheels/product/Columbus Instruments
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    activity wheels - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Mediagnost GmbH 3 wheel activity
    (A, B, D-E) No significant differences were observed between RW and ABA mice in the change of mean daily running wheel activity <t>(RWA),</t> overall mean daily RWA, or dark-phase RWA across <t>both</t> <t>habituation</t> and ABA periods. (C) During the light phase, ABA mice exhibited higher RWA than RW controls only during the ABA period (p = 0.0191). (F) During the light phase, RW group did not show a strong correlation between the % body weight loss during the ABA period and Δ Light-phase RWA, whereas a strong positive correlation was seen in the ABA group (Pearson’s r = 0.7251, p = 0.0022). (G) In both the RW and ABA group, no significant correlations between the % body weight loss during the ABA period and Δ dark-phase RWA were observed. Shaded areas represent the dark phase of the light cycle. ABA (Activity-Based Anorexia) and RW (running wheel) groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Analyses were performed using an unpaired t-test as well as a two-way ANOVA or mixed-effects models followed by Šidák’s post hoc comparisons. Pearson correlation analyses were performed for panels F and G. *p < 0.05.
    3 Wheel Activity, supplied by Mediagnost GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/3 wheel activity/product/Mediagnost GmbH
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    3 wheel activity - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Med Associates Inc wheel activity
    (A, B, D-E) No significant differences were observed between RW and ABA mice in the change of mean daily running wheel activity <t>(RWA),</t> overall mean daily RWA, or dark-phase RWA across <t>both</t> <t>habituation</t> and ABA periods. (C) During the light phase, ABA mice exhibited higher RWA than RW controls only during the ABA period (p = 0.0191). (F) During the light phase, RW group did not show a strong correlation between the % body weight loss during the ABA period and Δ Light-phase RWA, whereas a strong positive correlation was seen in the ABA group (Pearson’s r = 0.7251, p = 0.0022). (G) In both the RW and ABA group, no significant correlations between the % body weight loss during the ABA period and Δ dark-phase RWA were observed. Shaded areas represent the dark phase of the light cycle. ABA (Activity-Based Anorexia) and RW (running wheel) groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Analyses were performed using an unpaired t-test as well as a two-way ANOVA or mixed-effects models followed by Šidák’s post hoc comparisons. Pearson correlation analyses were performed for panels F and G. *p < 0.05.
    Wheel Activity, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/wheel activity/product/Med Associates Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    wheel activity - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    BIOSEB Inc spontaneous activity wheel system
    (A, B, D-E) No significant differences were observed between RW and ABA mice in the change of mean daily running wheel activity <t>(RWA),</t> overall mean daily RWA, or dark-phase RWA across <t>both</t> <t>habituation</t> and ABA periods. (C) During the light phase, ABA mice exhibited higher RWA than RW controls only during the ABA period (p = 0.0191). (F) During the light phase, RW group did not show a strong correlation between the % body weight loss during the ABA period and Δ Light-phase RWA, whereas a strong positive correlation was seen in the ABA group (Pearson’s r = 0.7251, p = 0.0022). (G) In both the RW and ABA group, no significant correlations between the % body weight loss during the ABA period and Δ dark-phase RWA were observed. Shaded areas represent the dark phase of the light cycle. ABA (Activity-Based Anorexia) and RW (running wheel) groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Analyses were performed using an unpaired t-test as well as a two-way ANOVA or mixed-effects models followed by Šidák’s post hoc comparisons. Pearson correlation analyses were performed for panels F and G. *p < 0.05.
    Spontaneous Activity Wheel System, supplied by BIOSEB Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/spontaneous activity wheel system/product/BIOSEB Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    spontaneous activity wheel system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Lafayette Instrument Co Inc activity wheel
    (A, B, D-E) No significant differences were observed between RW and ABA mice in the change of mean daily running wheel activity <t>(RWA),</t> overall mean daily RWA, or dark-phase RWA across <t>both</t> <t>habituation</t> and ABA periods. (C) During the light phase, ABA mice exhibited higher RWA than RW controls only during the ABA period (p = 0.0191). (F) During the light phase, RW group did not show a strong correlation between the % body weight loss during the ABA period and Δ Light-phase RWA, whereas a strong positive correlation was seen in the ABA group (Pearson’s r = 0.7251, p = 0.0022). (G) In both the RW and ABA group, no significant correlations between the % body weight loss during the ABA period and Δ dark-phase RWA were observed. Shaded areas represent the dark phase of the light cycle. ABA (Activity-Based Anorexia) and RW (running wheel) groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Analyses were performed using an unpaired t-test as well as a two-way ANOVA or mixed-effects models followed by Šidák’s post hoc comparisons. Pearson correlation analyses were performed for panels F and G. *p < 0.05.
    Activity Wheel, supplied by Lafayette Instrument Co Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/activity wheel/product/Lafayette Instrument Co Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    activity wheel - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Lafayette Instrument Co Inc scurry rat activity wheel with living chamber
    (A, B, D-E) No significant differences were observed between RW and ABA mice in the change of mean daily running wheel activity <t>(RWA),</t> overall mean daily RWA, or dark-phase RWA across <t>both</t> <t>habituation</t> and ABA periods. (C) During the light phase, ABA mice exhibited higher RWA than RW controls only during the ABA period (p = 0.0191). (F) During the light phase, RW group did not show a strong correlation between the % body weight loss during the ABA period and Δ Light-phase RWA, whereas a strong positive correlation was seen in the ABA group (Pearson’s r = 0.7251, p = 0.0022). (G) In both the RW and ABA group, no significant correlations between the % body weight loss during the ABA period and Δ dark-phase RWA were observed. Shaded areas represent the dark phase of the light cycle. ABA (Activity-Based Anorexia) and RW (running wheel) groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Analyses were performed using an unpaired t-test as well as a two-way ANOVA or mixed-effects models followed by Šidák’s post hoc comparisons. Pearson correlation analyses were performed for panels F and G. *p < 0.05.
    Scurry Rat Activity Wheel With Living Chamber, supplied by Lafayette Instrument Co Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/scurry rat activity wheel with living chamber/product/Lafayette Instrument Co Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    scurry rat activity wheel with living chamber - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A, B, D-E) No significant differences were observed between RW and ABA mice in the change of mean daily running wheel activity (RWA), overall mean daily RWA, or dark-phase RWA across both habituation and ABA periods. (C) During the light phase, ABA mice exhibited higher RWA than RW controls only during the ABA period (p = 0.0191). (F) During the light phase, RW group did not show a strong correlation between the % body weight loss during the ABA period and Δ Light-phase RWA, whereas a strong positive correlation was seen in the ABA group (Pearson’s r = 0.7251, p = 0.0022). (G) In both the RW and ABA group, no significant correlations between the % body weight loss during the ABA period and Δ dark-phase RWA were observed. Shaded areas represent the dark phase of the light cycle. ABA (Activity-Based Anorexia) and RW (running wheel) groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Analyses were performed using an unpaired t-test as well as a two-way ANOVA or mixed-effects models followed by Šidák’s post hoc comparisons. Pearson correlation analyses were performed for panels F and G. *p < 0.05.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Psilocybin exerts differential effects on social behaviour and inflammation in mice in contexts of activity-based anorexia (ABA)

    doi: 10.1101/2025.10.14.682467

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A, B, D-E) No significant differences were observed between RW and ABA mice in the change of mean daily running wheel activity (RWA), overall mean daily RWA, or dark-phase RWA across both habituation and ABA periods. (C) During the light phase, ABA mice exhibited higher RWA than RW controls only during the ABA period (p = 0.0191). (F) During the light phase, RW group did not show a strong correlation between the % body weight loss during the ABA period and Δ Light-phase RWA, whereas a strong positive correlation was seen in the ABA group (Pearson’s r = 0.7251, p = 0.0022). (G) In both the RW and ABA group, no significant correlations between the % body weight loss during the ABA period and Δ dark-phase RWA were observed. Shaded areas represent the dark phase of the light cycle. ABA (Activity-Based Anorexia) and RW (running wheel) groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Analyses were performed using an unpaired t-test as well as a two-way ANOVA or mixed-effects models followed by Šidák’s post hoc comparisons. Pearson correlation analyses were performed for panels F and G. *p < 0.05.

    Article Snippet: Mice were acclimated to the running wheel for 7 days (habituation period) to establish baseline levels of running wheel activity (RWA), which was monitored using the Wheel Manager Software (SOF-860, Med Associates Inc, USA).

    Techniques: Activity Assay